49 Million to 5
Date 2009-06-28 12:26:11
THE MURDER OF AMERICA'S MOST PROLIFIC SERIAL KILLER According to recent polls, a majority of Americans oppose abortion -- which is consistent with the left's hysterical refusal to allow us to vote on the subject. In a country with approximately 150 million pro-lifers, five abortionists have been killed since Roe v. Wade. In that same 36 years, more than 49 million babies have been killed by abortionists. Let's recap that halftime score, sports fans: 49 million to five. Meanwhile, fewer than 2 million Muslims live in America and, while Muslims are less murderous than abortionists, I'm fairly certain they've killed more than five people in the United States in the last 36 years. For some reason, the number 3,000-4,000 keeps popping into my head. So in a country that is more than 50 percent pro-life and 80 percent opposed to the late-term abortions of the sort performed by Tiller only five abortionists have been killed. And in a country that is less than 0.5 percent Muslim, several dozen Muslims have killed thousands of Americans. STAY WITH ME HERE ...how does the killing of about one abortionist per decade lead left wing liberals to condemn the entire pro-life movement as "domestic terroristism." Tiller bragged about performing 60,000 abortions, including abortions of viable babies, able to survive outside the mother's womb. He made millions of dollars performing late-term abortions so gruesome that only two other abortionists -- not a squeamish bunch -- in the entire country would perform them. The official Web page of the ELCA (The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America- Tiller's Church) instructs: "A developing life in the womb does not have an absolute right to be born." As long as we're deciding who does and doesn't have an "absolute right to be born," who's to say late-term abortionists have an "absolute right" to live? I wouldn't kill an abortionist myself, but I wouldn't want to impose my moral values on others. No one is for shooting abortionists. But how will criminalizing men making difficult, often tragic, decisions be an effective means of achieving the goal of reducing the shootings of abortionists? Following the moral precepts of liberals, I believe the correct position is: If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, then don't shoot one.
Edited for length and content from my favorite poltical columnist
Date 2009-06-28 12:26:11
THE MURDER OF AMERICA'S MOST PROLIFIC SERIAL KILLER According to recent polls, a majority of Americans oppose abortion -- which is consistent with the left's hysterical refusal to allow us to vote on the subject. In a country with approximately 150 million pro-lifers, five abortionists have been killed since Roe v. Wade. In that same 36 years, more than 49 million babies have been killed by abortionists. Let's recap that halftime score, sports fans: 49 million to five. Meanwhile, fewer than 2 million Muslims live in America and, while Muslims are less murderous than abortionists, I'm fairly certain they've killed more than five people in the United States in the last 36 years. For some reason, the number 3,000-4,000 keeps popping into my head. So in a country that is more than 50 percent pro-life and 80 percent opposed to the late-term abortions of the sort performed by Tiller only five abortionists have been killed. And in a country that is less than 0.5 percent Muslim, several dozen Muslims have killed thousands of Americans. STAY WITH ME HERE ...how does the killing of about one abortionist per decade lead left wing liberals to condemn the entire pro-life movement as "domestic terroristism." Tiller bragged about performing 60,000 abortions, including abortions of viable babies, able to survive outside the mother's womb. He made millions of dollars performing late-term abortions so gruesome that only two other abortionists -- not a squeamish bunch -- in the entire country would perform them. The official Web page of the ELCA (The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America- Tiller's Church) instructs: "A developing life in the womb does not have an absolute right to be born." As long as we're deciding who does and doesn't have an "absolute right to be born," who's to say late-term abortionists have an "absolute right" to live? I wouldn't kill an abortionist myself, but I wouldn't want to impose my moral values on others. No one is for shooting abortionists. But how will criminalizing men making difficult, often tragic, decisions be an effective means of achieving the goal of reducing the shootings of abortionists? Following the moral precepts of liberals, I believe the correct position is: If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, then don't shoot one.
Edited for length and content from my favorite poltical columnist
No comments:
Post a Comment